Now Playing Tracks

My Chemical Romance: If your marriage is legal when performed by a Magistrate, or a Justice of the Peace... where does the church come in??

familiaralien:

fauxnoozsux:

image

.

SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE!!!

.

image

FINALLY SOMEONE GETS IT!

Seriously real tried of getting into discussion with people that can’t tell the difference between a ceremony in a church and the license signed by two consenting parties that give them certain legal benefits normal couples do not have.

Just because weddings are often called “marriage” doesn’t mean the license requires a wedding let alone a wedding in a place of Christian worship.

Now can we all stop being completely freakin’ stupid and not talk about gay marriage as though it actually concerns Christianity? Because from now on anytime someone does that I’m just going to write in bold capslock (if its on the internet of course) “DERAILMENT!” because clearly the person either is a dumbfuck that doesn’t understand what marriage in modern times even means or is only bringing it up to make everything about Christianity like the privilege little piece of shit they are when nothing of this concerns that bloody freakin’ religion and never has.

EDIE & THEA: A VERY LONG ENGAGEMENT (TRAILER)

- Documentary film (2009) - a true love story about two New York women whose relationship spans over four decades.

Fitting to watch this as America’s highest court (Supreme Court) considers  DOMA and Prop 8 which will affect marriage equality.

LGBT rights movement IS the civil rights movement of our generation.

Love is patient. Love is kind.Love is love.

Equality for all.

I believe in LOVE.

I believe in EQUALITY.

cwnl:

Why Gay Parents May Be the Best Parents

Gay marriage, and especially gay parenting, has been in the cross hairs in recent days.

On Jan. 6, Republican presidential hopeful Rick Santorum told a New Hampshire audience that children are better off with a father in prison than being raised in a home with lesbian parents and no father at all. And last Monday (Jan. 9), Pope Benedict called gay marriage a threat “to the future of humanity itself,” citing the need for children to have heterosexual homes.

But research on families headed by gays and lesbians doesn’t back up these dire assertions. In fact, in some ways, gay parents may bring talents to the table that straight parents don’t.

Gay parents “tend to be more motivated, more committed than heterosexual parents on average, because they chose to be parents,” said Abbie Goldberg, a psychologist at Clark University in Massachusetts who researches gay and lesbian parenting. Gays and lesbians rarely become parents by accident, compared with an almost 50 percent accidental pregnancy rate among heterosexuals, Goldberg said. “That translates to greater commitment on average and more involvement.”

And while research indicates that kids of gay parents show few differences in achievement, mental health, social functioning and other measures, these kids may have the advantage of open-mindedness, tolerance and role models for equitable relationships, according to some research. Not only that, but gays and lesbians are likely to provide homes for difficult-to-place children in the foster system, studies show. (Of course, this isn’t to say that heterosexual parents can’t bring these same qualities to the parenting table.)

Adopting the neediest

Gay adoption recently caused controversy in Illinois, where Catholic Charities adoption services decided in November to cease offering services because the state refused funding unless the groups agreed not to discriminate against gays and lesbians. Rather than comply, Catholic Charities closed up shop.

Catholic opposition aside, research suggests that gay and lesbian parents are actually a powerful resource for kids in need of adoption. According to a 2007 report by the Williams Institute and the Urban Institute, 65,000 kids were living with adoptive gay parents between 2000 and 2002, with another 14,000 in foster homes headed by gays and lesbians. (There are currently more than 100,000 kids in foster care in the U.S.)

An October 2011 report by Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute found that, of gay and lesbian adoptions at more than 300 agencies, 10 percent of the kids placed were older than 6 — typically a very difficult age to adopt out. About 25 percent were older than 3. Sixty percent of gay and lesbian couples adopted across races, which is important given that minority children in the foster system tend to linger. More than half of the kids adopted by gays and lesbians had special needs.

Good parenting

Research has shown that the kids of same-sex couples — both adopted and biological kids — fare no worse than the kids of straight couples on mental health, social functioning, school performance and a variety of other life-success measures.

In a 2010 review of virtually every study on gay parenting, New York University sociologist Judith Stacey and University of Southern California sociologist Tim Biblarz found no differences between children raised in homes with two heterosexual parents and children raised with lesbian parents.

Nurturing tolerance

In fact, the only consistent places you find differences between how kids of gay parents and kids of straight parents turn out are in issues of tolerance and open-mindedness, according to Goldberg. In a paper published in 2007 in the American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Goldberg conducted in-depth interviews with 46 adults with at least one gay parent. Twenty-eight of them spontaneously offered that they felt more open-minded and empathetic than people not raised in their situation.

“These individuals feel like their perspectives on family, on gender, on sexuality have largely been enhanced by growing up with gay parents,” Goldberg said.

One 33-year-old man with a lesbian mother told Goldberg, “I feel I’m a more open, well-rounded person for having been raised in a nontraditional family, and I think those that know me would agree. My mom opened me up to the positive impact of differences in people.”

Keith Olbermann has always been a staunch supporter of gay rights and marriage equality. If you remember, he made a powerful and emotional Special Comment back in 2008 after California passed Prop 8 which repealed the legalisation of same-sex marriage in the state. His commentary was, to say the least, an unforgettable one.

On his show “Countdown” on Current TV this past Thursday night, before the New York State Senate eventually passed the same-sex marriage bill late on Friday, Keith once again used his Special Comment segment to make a strong, impassionate speech FOR same-sex marriage in New York and beyond.

Bravo, Mr. Olbermann and THANK YOU!

This state, when it is at its finest, is a beacon of social justice. The legacy of this state is that we were the progressive capital of this nation. And when you look back at so many of the great progressive movements that were birthed here in New York, the women’s rights movement was birthed here in New York. The environmental rights movement was birthed here in New York, Storm King on the Hudson. The worker’s rights movement was birthed here in New York after the Triangle Shirtwaist factory fire, all these great progressive movements. The gay rights movement was birthed at Stonewall. And what this state said today brings this discussion of marriage equality to a new plane. That’s the power and the beauty of New York. The other sates look to New York for the progressive direction and what we said today is you look to New York once again because New York made a powerful statement not just for the people of New York, but the people all across this nation. We reached a new level of social justice this evening.

Marriage Equality. I said to the legislators you look at the first word, marriage. It’s really about the second word, equality. It’s really about New Yorkers, our brothers and sisters, looking at us and saying we want equality. We want equality in society, equality in our relationships, equality in our love, equality in our families. We want full recognition. Marriage Equality. And we did it today.

Governor Cuomu (via kileyrae)
I know many people are concerned about the destruction of the sanctity of marriage, as well, and they view this as a threat. But let me as you something, ladies and gentlemen, what are we really protecting when you look at the divorce rate in our society? Turn on the television. We have a wedding channel on cable TV devoted to the behavior of people on their way to the altar. They spend billions of dollars, behave in the most appalling way, all in an effort to be princess for a day. You don’t have cable television? Put on network TV. We’re giving away husbands on a game show. You can watch “The Bachelor,” where 30 desperate women will compete to marry a 40-year-old man who has never been able to maintain a decent relationship in his life. We have “The Bachelorette,” in reverse. And my favorite show, which thank God only ran one season because it was truly distasteful, was “The Littlest Groom,” where 30 desperate women competed to marry a dwarf. That’s what we’ve done to marriage in America, where young women are socialized from the time they’re five years old to think of being nothing but a bride. They plan every day what they’ll wear, how they’ll look, the invitations, the whole bit. They don’t spend five minutes thinking about what it means to be a wife. People stand up there before God and man — even in Senator Diaz’s church — they swear to love, honor, and obey; they don’t mean a word of it. So if there’s anything wrong, any threat to the sanctity of marriage in America, it comes from those of us who have the privilege and the right, and we have abused it for decades.
NY Senator Diane Savino (via lady88)

thedailywhat:

Breaking News of the Day: The New York Senate tonight passed the controversial Marriage Equality Act after the crucial 32nd, and 33rd, votes were secured.

New York thus becomes the 6th state to legalize same-sex marriage, with the other five being Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont, Connecticut, and Iowa. (Same-sex marriage is also legal in the District of Columbia.)

Republican holdouts Sens. Steve Saland (R-Poughkeepsie) and Mark Grisanti (R-Buffalo), persuaded by the act’s religious protections, were responsible for contributing the decisive 32nd and 33rd votes; Sen. Greg Ball (R-Putnam), one of the fence-sitting Republicans who solicited opinions from his constituents via Twitter, decided earlier tonight to vote no.

[image: sherffius.]

(Source: thedailywhat)

To Tumblr, Love Pixel Union